![]() ![]() EFA suggested six factors: 1) collaborative teamwork, 2) population- and community-centred care, 3) communication and mutual respect, 4) clarification of roles and responsibilities, 5) interprofessional reflection, and 6) interprofessional values and mixed skills. Results: The findings showed an I-CVI range of 0.86–1.00 and S-CVI/UA = 0.87 for 49 items with a 5-point Likert scale. ![]() ![]() In the quantitative phase, content validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and reliability were conducted, and the final version of the questionnaire was evaluated with 497 participants. ![]() Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and trustworthiness was verified by triangulation and peer debriefing. In the qualitative phase, 37 participants, including policymakers, practitioners, and academics with experience in primary care, were involved. This study was designed as an exploratory mixed methods study. The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable instrument to assess the IPC competency of primary care team members in DHSs. However, there are limited instruments to assess IPC in providing primary care in the district health system (DHS) in Thailand. Evidence shows that interprofessional collaboration (IPC) practice contributes to the quality of health care. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |